Nigeria Hosts Ivory Coast, Ghana and Cameroon to Launch a Cocoa Value Addition Alliance in Abuja

Four African countries, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon, which together account for almost two-thirds of global cocoa production, launched a new alliance on Tuesday, July 14, at the Cocoa Value Addition Summit 2026 in Abuja, under the theme “From Bean to Brand.” The four countries signed the Abuja Declaration, establishing a regional alliance aimed at ending the export of raw cocoa beans and promoting value addition, positioning the bloc to negotiate with international cocoa buyers as a unified group responsible for about 75% of global cocoa production. Nigeria’s Minister of State for Industry, Trade and Investment, John Owan Enoh, framed the shift bluntly: “For a hundred years, Africa has sent its cocoa to the world in sacks and received it back in wrappers, paying at both ends of the transaction.” He added: “We do not gather to lament the market. We gather to redesign our place in it.”

Why it matters. Despite producing more than 70% of global cocoa, Africa’s five largest producing countries collectively earn only about $10 to $15 billion a year from cocoa exports, while Germany, Belgium, Poland, Italy, Switzerland and the Netherlands, none of which grow a single cocoa pod, together export around $28 billion worth of finished cocoa products annually using beans largely imported from West and Central Africa. Ghana Cocoa Board chief executive Ransford Abbey put a sharper number on the imbalance: Africa accounts for 75 to 77% of global cocoa production but receives less than 10% of the value generated by the international chocolate industry. Abbey noted that Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire alone already account for 60% of global output, and framed Nigeria and Cameroon’s accession as the step that pushes the bloc to a decisive 75% share, calling for both to formally join what he described as an initiative whose time has come.

What changes. Nigeria separately adopted a Cocoa Value Addition Accord, a national compact binding the Federal Government, cocoa-producing state governors, farmer organisations, industry groups and development finance institutions to measurable targets on processing and farmer income, overseen by a delivery council that will publish annual progress reports. Nigeria produces more than 300,000 tonnes of cocoa annually, but only about 50,000 tonnes of its installed processing capacity is currently in use, according to Bank of Industry managing director Olasupo Olusi, whose institution disbursed over ₦164 billion to more than 3,500 agro-processing businesses in 2025 and secured a €60 million credit facility from the European Investment Bank specifically for cocoa value addition. A separate industry presentation detailed construction of Nigeria’s largest cocoa processing plant, a 70,000-tonne facility in Sagamu, Ogun State, due for commissioning in 2027. The alliance’s first and most immediate priority is coordinating a common position on the EU’s Deforestation Regulation, which applies to large and medium operators from December 30, 2026, and requires plot-level traceability for all cocoa entering the European market, which absorbs roughly 60% of global cocoa exports. Enoh was explicit about the terms: the bloc wants recognition of members’ own national traceability systems, so that farmers are “not made to pay twice for the same proof,” and a shared position on how the regulation’s compliance burden is distributed.

What to watch. Uganda, Africa’s fifth-largest cocoa producer, attended the summit only as an observer rather than a signatory, with officials suggesting it could join in a later phase, which leaves the alliance’s ultimate size and bargaining weight still open. Analysts quoted at the summit said the initiative’s success will depend on access to energy, financing and consistent quality, the same structural constraints that have limited local processing for decades regardless of political will. The test that matters most is the EUDR deadline itself, five and a half months away: whether Brussels actually recognises the four countries’ national traceability systems as the alliance is demanding, or whether the compliance costs the bloc wants to avoid pushing onto smallholders end up there anyway. A declaration naming a shared negotiating position is not the same as Brussels accepting it, and that gap is where this alliance will either prove itself or stall.